Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192011 (ALL)

VIJAY PRAKASH CHAURASIYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/29200/2025 · 2025-10-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 29200 of 2025 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Sudhakar Shukla, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application has been filed by applicants for quashing the entire proceeding of Complaint No. 01 of 2025 (Virendra Pandey Vs. Vijay Prakash Chaurasiya) under Section 138 N.I. Act, District Maharajganj & impugned summoning order dated 26.05.2025 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Farenda. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the applicants states that he may be permitted to withdraw this application filed under Section 528 BNSS with liberty to file bail application before the court below. 4. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that trial court may be directed to decide the complaint in a time bound manner. 5. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayers. 6. Learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant would participate in the trial court proceedings. 7. Under the circumstances, the present application under Section 528 BNSS is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to applicant to approach the court concerned for bail. In order to enable the applicant to approach the court concerned for bail, for a period of 30 days, no coercive action shall Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gaurav Chauhan, Sriram Dhar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mahendra Prasad Shukla, Sudhakar Shukla Vijay Prakash Chaurasiya .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) be taken against the applicant. In case, the bail application is preferred by the applicant before the court concerned, the court concerned shall decide the same expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party. 8. The trial court is also directed to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously. 9. The application under Section 528 BNSS is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty and direction. October 13, 2025 D. Tamang NA528 No. 29200 of 2025 2 (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad