APHC010266672003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 10492/2003 Between: 1. G.RAMACHANDRA RAO,, S/O.NARSAIAH, SECRETARY, NALLAJARLA L.S.C.S., NALLAJARLA MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. 2. G.VENKATA SIVA RAMA RAO,, S/O.RAMACHANDRA RAO, CLERK, NALLAJARLA L.S.C.S., NALLAJARLA MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT. 2. THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER/, DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOP. SOCIETIES, ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANTHAPALLI P.S., NALLAJERLA MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction mire particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Proceedings Rc.No.494/2002-C, dated:28.4.2003 on the file of the 2nd respondent and all the consequential proceedings including proceeding in Cr.No.41/2003 on the file of the 3rd respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and also contrary to the provisions of A.P.C.S.Act and set aside the same and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 13166 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings Rc.No.494/2002-C, dated:28.4.2003 on the file of the 2nd respondent and consequential proceedings relating to Cr.No.41/2003 on the file of the 3rd respondent including arrest of the petitioners pending disposal of the writ petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri D.Viswakanth Babu, learned counsel representing Sri G.V.Shivaji, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 11th September, 2025 RKS