Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15311 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Ravi Sahu, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was initially inducted as Constable and thereafter promoted on the post of Head Constable and superannuated on 31.12.2019. the claim of the writ petitioner is that there certain recoveries were being sought to be effectuated and the pension of the writ petitioner has not been determined as per the disentitlement .
3. Prayer in the present petition is for direction to consider the respondent, Assistant Account Officer, N.I. Finance Controller, Allahabad to revise the pension of the writ petitioner in the pay scale of Rs. 2600/-.
4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that a conscious decision is required to be taken by the respondent.
5. Considering the submission so made across the bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to approach the third respondent while filing a comprehensive representation along with a self attested copy of the writ petition and certified copy of the order and on the said motion, the third respondent shall consider the claim of the writ petitioner within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of the order. In case, the third respondent is of the opinion that the matter needs to be redress some other authority then the papers be transmitted to it with due intimation to the writ petitioner to provide inputs if so required. October 13, 2025 Rajesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Sahu Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Mahaveer Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad