HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35738 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Ramesh Narayan Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Shridhar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel representing the respondent-Gram Sabha. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent No. 2, the Sub Divisional Officer/Assistant Collector Ist Class, Tehsil Khair, District Aligarh, to decide the Suit No. T201318213472/2013, [Krishna Devi and Another Vs. Smt. Nigat and Others], under Section 229-B of the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, 1950, within a stipulated time period. Petitioners have asserted themselves to be plaintiffs in the suit. Counsel for the petitioners has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition, to point out that although several dates have been fixed, but for some reason or the other, the matter is being adjourned and the delay in disposal of the case is causing undue hardship to the petitioners. Attention is also drawn to para 458 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, wherein it is provided that the court concerned is to make an endeavour to decide a suit within a period of one year from the date of its institution. Accordingly, the petitioners, by way of the present petition have sought for proceedings to be concluded expeditiously. Counsel appearing for the State-respondents has no objection if the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohan Lal Pandey, Ramesh Narayan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Krishna Kant Singh Krishna Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) proceedings are expedited. Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with an observation that the court/authority concerned would make an endeavor to decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of one year granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties and keeping in view the mandate providing a period for one year for a suit to be decided, as noted above, provided there is no other legal impediment. October 14, 2025 Arun K. Singh WRIC No. 35738 of 2025 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad