Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 191951 (ALL)

SMT. SAPNA KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

TACR/227/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 227 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Sri Shiv Murti Kushwaha, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Anil Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, leaned Brief Holder for the State are present. 2. The instant transfer application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to transfer the Sessions Case No. 1715 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No. 59 of 2024, under Sections 323, 307 IPC and Section 3/25/27 Arms Act, Police Station Pisawa, District Aligarh pending in the court of Sessions Judge, Aligarh to District Court Bulandshahar or nearest District of Bulandshahar. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant submits, applicant is wife of opposite party no.2 and she is even informant of the case and she filed instant transfer application to transfer the case from District Aligarh to District Bulandshahar but applicant is ready to pursue the matter through Video Conferencing and therefore instant application may be disposed off with the direction that if applicant filed an application before appropriate forum to appear through Video Conferencing then her application shall be entertained and she will be permitted to appear through Video Conferencing. 4. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for opposite party no.2 are having no objection. 5. The instant transfer application has been filed by the applicant, who is wife of opposite party no.2 to transfer the case from District Aligarh to District Bulandshahar but now she is ready to pursue the matter through Video Conferencing, therefore, instant transfer application is being disposed off with a direction that if applicant filed an application to pursue the matter Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shiv Murti Kushwaha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anil Kumar Dubey, Chandra Bhan Dubey, G.A. Smt. Sapna Kumari .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) through Video Conferencing then her application shall be considered and she will be permitted to pursue the matter through Video Conferencing. 6. Stay order, if any, shall stands vacated. October 14, 2025 AK Pandey TACR No. 227 of 2025 2 (Sameer Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad