HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 6041 of 2025 Court No. - 91 HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned AGA appearing for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist again the impugned order dated 3.9.2025 passed by the Additional Session Judge, Fast Track Court, Court No.2, Ghaziabad in S.T. No.35 of 2025 (State of UP vs. Sarabjeet Singh) arising out of Case Crime No.357 of 2024 under Sections 376, 406 IPC, Police Station-Madhuvan Bapudham, District-Ghaziabad. 3.The submission of learned counsel for the revisionist is that both are the consenting party. Hence, the impugned order is illegal and the revisionist is liable to be discharged. He has placed reliance upon the judgments of Supreme Court in Pramod Suryabhan Pawar vs. The State of Maharashtra, 2019(9) SCC 608 and Mandar Deepak Pawar vs. The State of Maharashtra and another passed in Criminal Appeal No.442 of 2022 on 27.7.2022. 4. There is an established fact in the FIR that there are relations between revisionist and opposite party No.2. The trial is yet to begin and no final finding could be given at this stage. Prima facie, there are relations between the revisionist and opposite party No.2/victim. Hence, in view thereof, there is neither any illegality or perversity in the impugned order dated 3.9.2025. Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Mukesh Chandra Gupta, Shubham Prakash Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sarabjeet Singh .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. The present criminal revision is not liable to be admitted. It is dismissed, accordingly. October 7, 2025 LN Tripathi CRLR No. 6041 of 2025 2 (Abdul Shahid,J.) Digitally signed by :- LALIT TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad