IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 11466 of 2025 Decided on 17th July 2025 Rakesh Kumar and another …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Singh, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) After making his submissions for some time and in the light of the observation made by the Court that as primarily, it is a private lis between the petitioner and the private respondents, therefore, adjudication thereof under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not possible, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioners be allowed to withdraw the petition, so that they can pursue the remedy before the appropriate Fora. 2. Petition is dismissed as withdraw with liberty as prayed for, so also pending miscellaneous applications, if any (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 17, 2025 (Vinod)