Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33903 of 2025 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Shashank Shekhar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party.
2. The present bail application has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 186 of 2025, under Section 105 B.N.S., Police Station Rudrapur, District Deoria during the pendency of the trial.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The applicant is in jail since 23.06.2025 having no criminal history.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail.
5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this Court prima facie finds that as per the first information report the applicant and named accused Rajesh Pandey caused injuries to the brother of the informant. According to the postmortem report, the cause of death is hemorrhage and shock due to ante mortem head injury. In the statement of the eye witness- Vinod Tiwari specific role of assault on the head of the deceased by a brick has been assigned to the applicant.
6. The offence is grave. There is likelihood that the applicant committed the offence. No case for bail is made out. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Chandra Kushwaha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rakesh Pandey .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected.
8. It is made clear that the observations made in this order shall have no bearing on the merits of the case.
9. However, it is observed that the trial court would endeavour to conclude the trial expeditiously. October 14, 2025 SKT/- BAIL No. 33903 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad