Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19192 (BOM)

DNYANESHWAR VITHAL SANAP v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/1026/2025 · 2025-08-07

Shri Arun R Pedneker

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 961 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 961 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1026 OF 2025 DNYANESHWAR VITHAL SANAP VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Syed Azizoddin R. (Appointed through Legal Aid) APP for Respondent/State: Mrs. V. N. Patil Jadhav ... CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 07.08.2025 PER COURT: 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the CCTV footage in which the applicant is seen assaulting the deceased is sent for forensic. 2. Considering that the forensic report is not available, applicant is granted liberty to apply for bail before the trial court after receipt of the CCTV footage. There is also eye witness evidence on record. The matter can be considered after forensic report is available. 3. The application is accordingly disposed of. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] marathe 2025:BHC-AUG:21274