Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 191883 (ALL)

MANSHI PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/29410/2025 · 2025-10-08

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29410 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: "That in view of the facts and circumstances of the case it is expedient in the interest of justice that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent parties to issue a Character certificate of the petitioner needed for joining in a Multi National Companies through compus placement in the interest of justice. And/or issue any other suitable writ, order or direction directing Respondent parties to consider the application of the petitioner for issuance of character certificate to the petitioner in the interest of justice." 3. It is stated that the petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent No.3-Superintendent of Police, District Gorakhpur to consider her grievances but the respondent No.3 is not paying any heed to it. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent No.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sakshi Jaiswal, Vimal Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Manshi Prajapati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all her grievances before the respondent No.3-Superintendent of Police, District Gorakhpur within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the same in light of the guidelines laid down by this Court in bunch of writ petitions leading of which is Writ-C No.718 of 2025 (Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. & Others) within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives the representation. October 9, 2025 Gaurav WRIC No. 29410 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad