Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010206312025 2025:GAU-AS:13503 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3055/2025 KALIMUDDIN AHMED S/O-LATE RASID ALI, R/O-H/NO-MOLLAPARA, P.O.- HOWLY MOHANPUR, P.S- MANGALDAI, DIST.- DARRANG, PRN- 784529 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM INIGATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI781006 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-781003. 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MANGALDAI DIVISION(INIGATION) DISTRICT- DANANG ASSAM PIN784529 4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI781006 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A HUSSAIN, Z ROHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, IRRIGATION, Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : WP(C)/7494/2023 KALIMUDDIN AHMED S/O LT. RASID ALI R/O H NO. MOLLAPARA P.O. HOWLY MOHANPUR P.S MANGALDAI DIST. DARRANG PIN 784529 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASAM IRRIGATION DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPTT ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 781003 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MANGALDAI DIVISIN IRRIGATION DIST. DARRANG ASSAM PIN 784529 ------------ Advocate for : MR. A HUSSAIN Advocate for : SC IRRIGATION appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 26.09.2025 Heard Mr. A. Hussain, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Ms. B.S. Neog, learned standing counsel for the Irrigation Department representing respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. A. Chaliha, learned standing counsel for the Finance Department appearing for the respondent no. 4. By filing this interlocutory application, the applicant who is the petitioner in the connected WP(C) 7494/2023, seeks to implead the Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Finance Department as respondent no. 4. On hearing the learned standing counsel for the Irrigation Department and Page No.# 3/3 learned counsel for the Finance Department, the prayer made in this interlocutory application stands allowed. As impleadement of respondent no. 4 in the connected writ petition Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant