Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19185 (JHR)

ANKUR KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6012/2025 · 2025-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:19614] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6012 of 2025 ------ 1. Ankur Kumar Singh, aged about 21 years, Son of Arun Singh, resident of Brindavan Nagar, P.S. and P.O. Ratu, Kamre, District- Ranchi. 2. Harsh Kumar Vishwakarma, aged about 19 years, son of Gagandev Vishwakarma, Resident of Opp. Canara Bank, Shree Nagar Colony Kamre, P.O. and P.S. Ratu, District- Ranchi. 3. Anuj Mahto, aged about 21 years, son of Dinesh Mahto, Resident of Defence Colony, Pandra, Kamre, P.O. and P.S. Pandra, District- Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-17-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No.287 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25 (1-B)a, 25(1-B)e, 26, 25(6) and 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the co-accused and the petitioners were involved in illegal possession of country-made pistol along with two live cartridges and the petitioners were with the co-accused. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 01.06.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No.287 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/