Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19184 (ALL)

RAJEEV KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/5127/2025 · 2025-03-18

Kshitij Shailendra, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:40492-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5127 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Narendra Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities in considering and deciding the application of the petitioner dated December 30, 2024 submitted for disconnecting the electricity connection. 3. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and perusing the records, we are of the view that the petitioner should be directed to file a fresh application in correct format before the Executive Engineer, E.D.D., Kaushambi, being the respondent No.3 herein, within two weeks from date. In the event such an application is filed within the said period, the respondent No.3 is directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and thereafter, pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of fresh application by the petitioner. 4. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Rakesh (Kshitij Shailendra, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad