Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19183 (AP)

Mullangi Hari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/17639/2020 · 2025-08-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010267362020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17639/2020 Between: 1. MULLANGI HARI, S/O RAGHAVAIAH@CHINARAGHAVA, AGE 38 YEARS,OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO1-156, WEST GUDLADONA VILLAGE, KALIGIRI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI,GUNUTR DISTRICT. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KALIGIRI MANDAL, KALIGIRI,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE STATION, KAVALI,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALIGIRI POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ,ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the proceedings in Rc.A.122/2020 dated 08.09.2020 promulgated by the respondent No.2 under Section 145 Criminal Procedure Code, on the basis of biased report of the 4th 2 respondent, without following the due process of law laid down U/s. 145 Criminal Procedure Code, as illegal, arbitrary which violates of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently praying this Honble Court to set aside the proceedings in Rc.A.122/2020 dated 08.09.2020 issued by the 2nd respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings in Rc.A.122/2020 dated 08.09.2020 issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R MACHAVARAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the proceedings in Rc.A.122/2020 dated 08.09.2020 promulgated by the respondent No.2 under Section 145 Criminal Procedure Code, on the basis of biased report of the 4th respondent, without following the due process of law laid down U/s. 145 Criminal Procedure Code, as illegal, arbitrary which violates of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently praying this Honble Court to set aside the proceedings in Rc.A.122/2020 dated 08.09.2020 issued by the 2nd respondent and pass...…” 2. Heard Sri V.R.Machavaram, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.08.2025 MH 4 5 109 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17639/2020 Date: 06.08.2025 MH