Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19183 (ALL)

ABHINAV GUPTA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/4591/2025 · 2025-03-04

Siddhartha Varma, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:32002-DB Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4591 of 2025 Petitioner :- Abhinav Gupta Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Sharma,Upendra Malaviya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohd. Afzal Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard Sri Upendra Malviya, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and Sri Mohd. Afzal, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3. 2. The petitioner seeks issuance of writ of mandamus directing respondent no.2, District Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar to take appropriate action for executing the recovery certificate dated 6.1.2024. It has been submitted by the petitioner that the recovery certificate against respondent no.4 was issued as far back as on 6.1.2024, but the same has not been executed by the District Magistrate so far and the petitioner is being denied fruits of the order of RERA Authorities passed in his favour on 12.1.2024. 3. Learned Standing Counsel representing respondent no.1 and 2 submits that no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the writ petition pending and the same can be disposed of directing the District Magistrate to proceed with the execution of the recovery certificate. 4. Having regard to the above submissions, we dispense with the service of notice upon respondent no.4 and dispose of the writ petition with direction to respondent-District Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar to make serious endeavor to execute recovery certificate dated 6.1.2024, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months, provided there is no legal impediment. In case, there is any legal impediment, the District Magistrate will pass a speaking order within two weeks from the date of receipt of a true attested copy of the instant order. 5. In view of the observations made above, writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Order Date :- 5.3.2025 RKK/- (Dr Y K Srivastava, J) (Siddhartha Varma, J) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad