Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 191824 (ALL)

SMT. SUSHMA MISHRA v. UNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/35761/2025 · 2025-10-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35761 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Sri Anurag Yadav, learned counsel has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.2 in Court today, which is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Keshav Hari Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel for the respondent no.1, Sri Anurag Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents to compute and release the amount of compensation awarded to the petitioner in the award dated 20.05.2017, in favour of the petitioner. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents to compute and pay interest at a rate of 18% p.a., on the amount of compensation. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents to consider and pass suitable orders on the representation dated 1.8.2025." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed his representation on 01.08.2025, appended as Annexure-5 to the writ petition and the same be decided in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Keshav Hari Dixit Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Dinesh Kumar Singh, Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal Smt. Sushma Mishra .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Considering the factual aspect of the issue involved, without adverting into the merit of the case, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with an observation that in case, the petitioner moves a detailed representation within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent no.3 in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders. Needless to say that in case, if the claim of the petitioner is sustainable in the eyes of law, then the amount shall be released forthwith in accordance with law, if there is no impediment for the same. October 28, 2025 Priya WRIC No. 35761 of 2025 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad