Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19179 (GAU)

HANIF UDDIN BARBHUIYA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/1020/2025 · 2025-09-17

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010248462018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./446/2018 HANIF UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O. AKADDAS ALI BARBHUIYA, R/O. VILL. BORJOPUR, P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM-788155. VERSUS ABIDUR RAHMAN LASKAR AND ANR. S/O. LT. ABDUL MOTIN LASKAR, VILL. BADARPUR PART-I, P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM-788155. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H I CHOUDHURY, MR REZABUL HOQUE,MR. P K ROYCHOUDHURY,G UDDIN,MR N Y KONYAK,MS. P A TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, J SINGPHO (r-1),MR. M BISWAS (r-1),MR. D H MOZUMDER (R1),MR F A LASKAR (R1) Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/1020/2025 HANIF UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O. AKADDAS ALI BARBHUIYA R/O. VILL. BORJOPUR P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM-788155. Page No.# 2/3 2: ABIDUR RAHMAN LASKAR S/O. LT. ABDUL MOTIN LASKAR VILL. BADARPUR PART-I P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM-788155. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. P K ROYCHOUDHURY Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 18.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. P.K. Roy Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. A. Malik, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. 2. This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant/appellant/revisionist of criminal revision No.446/2018, whereby, it is stated that the applicant has already paid the total amount of Rs.2,00,000/-to the respondents and the respondents has accordingly, compromise the matter and accordingly, has prayed for disposing of the connected criminal revision petition on the basis of compromise by set aside the impugned judgment of conviction and sentenced of the petitioner. 3. The interlocutory application has been supported by the affidavit of the petitioner as well as that the respondent. The learned counsel for the Page No.# 3/3 respondents namely, Abidur Rahman Laskar has also submitted that the matter has been amicably settled and this matter may be disposed of on compromise. 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants as well as averments made in the interlocutory application supported by the affidavit filed by both the parties, the prayer is allowed. The Criminal Revision Petition No. 446/2018 disposed of on compromise and the impugned judgment and the order dated 12.09.2018 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Hailakandi in criminal appeal No.06/2018 as well as the judgment dated 22.12.2017 passed by the Court of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hailakandi in C.R. Case No. 28(A)/2013 is hereby set aside. 5. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant