Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 191787 (MAD)

RAMALINGAM v. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER

WP/47681/2025 · 2025-12-10

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 47681 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-12-2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 47681 of 2025 RAMALINGAM, S/o.Renganathan, No.4/91, North Street, Veeratikuppam Village, Periyakappankulam, Vriddhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.The Revenue Divisional Office, Vriddhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore- District. 2.The Tashildar, Taluk Office, Vriddhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District. 3.The Surveyor, Taluk Office, Vriddhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District. 4.PRABAKARAN, S/o. Periyakappankulam, Vriddhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Respondent(s) Directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to conduct survey on petitioner property in S.No.225/3D an extent of 6 1/2 cents situated at Periyakappankulam village, vriddhachalam taluk, cuddalore- District, and sub- divide the same and fix the boundary stone by considering the representation of petitioner dated 27.11.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.BALAJI For Respondent(s): MR R.P MURUGAN RAJA, GOVT ADVOCATE (R1 to R3) __________Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 47681 of 2025 ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his representation dated 27.11.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner had submitted a representation on 27.11.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse orders are passed against the fourth respondent, notice to the fourth respondent in this writ petition is dispensed with. 4. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents 2 and 3, if they are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner’s property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing objections from the fourth respondent as well as any other party as they deem fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:- __________Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 47681 of 2025 (a) Before surveying the land in question, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to issue notice to the fourth respondent, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to enquire. (b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 2 and 3 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No Costs. 10-12-2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.The Revenue Divisional Office, Vriddhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore- District. 2.The Tashildar, Taluk Office, Vriddhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District. 3.The Surveyor, Taluk Office, Vriddhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District. __________Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 47681 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKM WP No. 47681 of 2025 10-12-2025 __________Page 4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis