Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19175 (CHH)

RAJESH KHAKHA v. THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR

WPS/3278/2023 · 2025-03-27

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:14929 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3278 of 2023 1 - Rajesh Khakha S/o Late Shri Babulal Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Jainagar, Ward No. 04, Uravpara, Jainagar, Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - The Chairman cum Managing Director South Eastern Coal Filed Limited, Seepat Road, S E C L, H G, G M, (Personnel) Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The South Eastern Coal Filed Limited (Mini Ratna Company) Office Of The Chief General Manager, Bishrampur Area, Post Bishrampur Colary, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Manager S. E. C. L. Bishrampur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Deputy Chief Personnel Manager S. E. C. L. Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Personnel Manager Rehar Gayatri Cum Area, Jainagar, Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Personnel Manager S. E. C. L. Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7 - The Deputy Chief Medical Officer Central Hospital, Bishrampur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 8 - The Collector Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.04.21 11:27:01 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Shri Sunil Verma, Advocate with Petitioner in person For Respective Respondents : Shri V.R. Tiwari, Senior Advocate with Shri Sudhir Kumar Bajpai, Advocate and Shri Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 27/03/2025 1. In pursuance of the order of this Court dated 12.3.2025, the respondent/SECL’s Officer-in-Charge of this case has filed his affidavit while giving reasons as to why the fact regarding filing and passing of earlier order has not been brought on record. 2. For the reasons mentioned in paragraphs 8 and 9 of the explanation this Court is satisfied that the Officer-in-Charge of this case has duly explained the reason for non-mentioning of the earlier order passed by this Court. 3. Looking to the fact that the petitioner has suppressed the material fact regarding filing of the earlier petition, a sum of Rs.5,000 is imposed upon him as cost to be deposited by him with the Chhattisgarh High Court Bar Association within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, the petitioner is warned not to do the same in future otherwise necessary action will be taken against him upon receipt of any information in his respect. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh