CHANDRA PAL AND ANOTHER v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) AND ANOTHER
WTAX/4582/2025 · 2025-10-12
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191744 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191744 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 4582 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.
1. At the outset, Sri Parv Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent state that seized cash and jewellery has been returned to the petitioners.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and it is dismissed as such. October 13, 2025 Prachi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Parv Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhishek Shukla, Ankur Agarwal (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Chandra Pal And Another .....Petitioner(s) Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRACHI KESARWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad