Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35066 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Hari Prakash Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Sri Vijay Bhan Singh, holding brief of Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Gram Sabha. The present petition has been filed seeking to assail a notice dated 28.06.2024 issued in Form RC-20, in relation to proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, registered as Case No. 2607 of 2024, computerized case no. T202415060602607(Report vs. Sitabi). It is not disputed that the notice under Form RC-20 is issued the stage of initiation of proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner having been duly served with notice, would have ample opportunity to file an objection and to contest the proceedings. In this view of the matter, the writ petition which has been filed challenging the notice, would not be entertainable. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Prakash Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Sitabi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
The writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to file his objections in the proceedings under Section 67 and to contest the same.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) October 14, 2025 Imroz WRIC No. 35066 of 2025 2
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD IMROZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad