HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15464 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Shri Kuldeep Singh Chahar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner as well as Shri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner applied for recruitment on the post of U.P. Police Radio Assistant Operator pursuant to a recruitment exercise undertaken in the year 2022. An admit card came to be issued to the writ petitioner containing roll no.14129308149 and post participation in the written examination on 01.02.2024, the writ petitioner was declared successful and he also participated in the physical examination conducted on 10.03.2025 where he was selected. Thereafter, during the course of the medical examination, he was declared unsuitable and he preferred Writ - A No. 8666 of 2025 (Akshay Kumar Vs. State of UP), which came to be disposed of on 03.07.2025 and thereafter again on 11.08.2025, the writ petitioner was required to appear on 12.08.2025 and in the re-medical examination, he was declared successful on 25.08.2025. 3. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the PVR of the writ petitioner is not being conducted and he has not been issued an appointment order in that regard. However, similarly situated are being accorded benefits. 4. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that the grievance of the writ petitioner needs redressal at the first instance by the Controller of Examination Recruitment, U.P. Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow. 5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar and looking into the overall facts and situation, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the copy of the said representation and certified copy of the order passed today before the respondent no.2 by 27th October, 2025. On the said motion, the second Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kuldeep Singh Chahar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Akshay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) respondent shall endeavour to decide the claim of the writ petitioner and redress the grievance within a period of one month thereafter. In case, the second respondent is of the opinion that the matter needs to be redressed by any other authority, then the writ petitioner be put to notice and paper be transmitted to that authority. October 15, 2025 Gurpreet Singh WRIA No. 15464 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- GURPREET SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad