Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8788 of 2024 Date of decision: 02.07.2025 Ranjeet Singh. ...Petitioner. Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Hemant Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Abhinav Mohan Goel, Advocate, vice Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Pursuant to the order passed in this writ petition, learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record office instructions dated 01.07.2025 and on that basis submits that due and admissible liability of the respondents towards the petitioner has been cleared. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits the above position, however, he submits that the interest component on the delayed payment of retiral benefits still remains to be paid. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the interest component on account of delayed -2- payment of retiral benefits shall be cleared by the respondent within a period of six weeks. 3. Taking note of aforesaid office instructions and submission made by learned counsel for the respondents, this writ petition is disposed of. Petitioner is, however, at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for redressal of his surviving grievances, at an appropriate stage in case necessity so arises. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 2nd July, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)