PADAM SINGH THAKUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/39050/2025 · 2025-10-06
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191661 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191661 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39050 of 2025 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
1. Learned counsel for the applicants states that he does not want to press this application and prays that the same may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
2. In view of the above, the present application is dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty.
3. Certified copy of the F.I.R./order sheet be returned to the applicants as per rule after retaining a photo-stat copy of the same on the record. October 7, 2025 Meenu Singh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pavanesh Mishra, Santosh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Deepak Verma,J.) Padam Singh Thakur And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad