ZARIR AHMED LASKAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
WP(C)/6256/2019 · 2025-03-02
Suman Shyam
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19165 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19165 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010205712019
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6256/2019 ZARIR AHMED LASKAR S/O- ABDUR RAHMAN LASKAR, R/O- VILL- BANDASHIL, P.O- BADARPUR, DIST- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN- 788806 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY POWER (ELECTRICITY) DEPTT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 06 2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR APDCL BIJULI BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI- 781001 3:THE CHAIRMAN SELECTION COMMITTEE B BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI- 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H R KHAN, MS. N GOSWAMI,MRS. M BARMAN,MR N ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : SC, APDCL,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Page No.# 2/2 ORDER Date : 03-03-2025 None appears for the writ petitioner. Mr. B. Choudhury, learned standing counsel, APDCL appearing for the respondents submits that the prayer of the petitioner pertains to the recruitment process initiated in the year 2018, which process has been concluded long back and the selected candidates have not only been appointed but have also been promoted to the next higher posts. As such, submits Mr. Choudhury, this writ petition has become infractuous. I find from the record that even on the previous occasion, the petitioner’s counsel was absent. From the above, it is clear that the petitioner is no longer serious to pursue this matter before this Court. It also appears that there is no live issue involved in this proceeding at this point of time. As such and on the submission of Mr. Choudhury, this writ petition stands disposed of as infractuous.
JUDGE GS Comparing Assistant