HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12415 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed challenging the order passed in Matrimonial Case No. 1145 of 2024 allowing the application under Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act. 3. The petitioner is not a party to the proceedings. He is father of the wife and an application on his behalf is not maintainable and objection filed by the petitioner has rightly been rejected by the court below. 4. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. October 13, 2025 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Mishra, Devendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sundar Bhati .....Petitioner(s) Dinnu Singh And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad