Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 191635 (ALL)

RAJESH KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/32922/2025 · 2025-10-08

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32922 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners are aggrieved for non compliance of the order of temporary injunction passed by Civil Court in O.S. No. 335 of 2021. In our considered view, petitioner may make an appropriate misc. application under Order 39 Rule 2(A) of C.P.C. for appropriate relief against the violation of order of temporary injunction. In view of the above, we decline to grant indulgence in the matter at this stage, we still provide that in the event petitioner moves an an appropriate misc. application under Order 39 Rule 2(A) of C.P.C., the court concerned shall proceed to pass appropriate orders upon the same ensuring compliance of order of temporary injunction. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. October 9, 2025 IrfanUddin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Rajesh Kumar Pandey And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad