Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19161 (HP)

SAURABH SINGH v. NEETIKA THAKUR

CMP.M/58/2025 · 2025-03-28

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Saurav Singh Thakur Vs. Neetika Thakur CMP(M) No. 58/2025 28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Vijay K. Verma, Advocate, for the respondent. CMP(M) No. 58/2025 For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, we find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 45 days that has crept up in filing the appeal. Ordered accordingly. The application stands disposed of FAO (FC) _______ /2025 Appeal be registered. Since the present appeal emanates out of a matrimonial discord, it is incumbent upon this Court to make an endeavor to resolve the same amicably. Therefore, let both the parties appear before this Court on the next date of hearing so as to explore the possibility of amicable settlement. List on 11.04.2025. [ ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 28th March, 2025 (raman)