Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 191604 (ALL)

OM PRAKASH v. State of UP 2 Others

CRLR/396/2024 · 2025-10-08

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 396 of 2024 Court No. - 90 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned AGA for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 and perused the record. 2. A perusal of order dated 17.11.2023 reveals that the application moved by the revisionist under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C has been dismissed, on the basis of territorial jurisdiction holding that the offence whatsoever has been committed in the State of Gujarat and, therefore, the matter cannot be taken to its legal course in the District Kannauj, (U.P.). 3. Under such circumstances, the revisionist is at liberty to take up the matter to its legal course, at the place where the offence has been committed, since the entire evidence whatever is available at the place where the said incident took place and thereafter may proceed in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the revision is accordingly disposed of. October 9, 2025 Vikram Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Mukesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ram Babu Singh (Harvir Singh,J.) Om Prakash .....Revisionist(s) State Of Up 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad