Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010266822021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15445/2021 Between:
1. RAYIDI SESHAGIRI, S/O. JAGANNADHA RAO, AGED 46, R/ O.
HOUSE NO. 11-23-4/3, RAMIREDDYPET, NARASARAOPET TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. TADAPANENI KRISHNA VENI,, W/O. RAMA RAO, AGED 46, R/O.
PRAKASH NAGAR, MAIN ROAD, NARASARAOPET TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET I TOWN P.S., NARASARAOPET TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P SAI SURYA TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling the petitioners to attend. before him and instructing to settle the civil disputes by repaying to or executing promissory-notes and security bonds in respect of the alleged debtors of Sri Tadapaneni Rama Rao S/o. Ramakrishnaiah, R/o. Narasaraopet Town and without issuing notice as illegal, contrary to law, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and without jurisdiction and consequently
2
direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioners to attend the police station without issuing notice.”
2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the Police never called the Petitioners and never interfered with the civil disputes between the Petitioners and others.
3. Sri P.Sai Surya Teja, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.09.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.15445 of 2021
Dt.16.09.2025
Dinesh