HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2814 of 2024 Court No. - 90 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present revision has been filed against the orders dated 20.3.2024, as well as 21.3.2024 passed by Additional Sessions Judge / Special Judge, Lalitpur in Session Trial No. 51 of 2016 (State vs. Ram Singh) and Session Trial No. 57 of 2016 (State vs. Mardan and another). 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 has raised a preliminary objection that the present revision is not maintainable against the Judgement passed by Additional Sessions Judge / Special Judge (D.A.A.), Lalitpur for the reason that in Session Trial No. 51 of 2016, there were three accused persons namely, Ram Singh, Bhura and Mradan. Out of three persons, Ram Singh has been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and other two accused persons have been acquitted. He further submits that a Jail Appeal No. 537 of 2024 moved by accused Ram Singh against the order of convection is pending disposal. Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Satyadeep Gautam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Jaysingh Yadav Roop Lal .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Under the circumstances, the present revision is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. 5. However, it shall remain open to the revisionist to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law, if so advised. (Harvir Singh,J.) October 14, 2025 Faridul CRLR No. 2814 of 2024 2 Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad