Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body
2025 DAILYLAW 19156 (AP)
G Sudharshanam, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/13703/2025 · 2025-07-08
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19156 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19156 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
ff • -1 ft APHC010265642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATT!^ WRIT PETITION NO: 13703 OF 2025 Between: G Sudharshanam, S/o. Padmanaabaiah, R/o. 1 Mattam Village, KVB Puram Chittoor District. ...Petitioner-- AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Vigilance and Enforcement department. Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Vigilance and Enforcement department. Commissioner, 3rd floor, NTR Administrative Block, Pandit Nehru Bus station, Vijayawada, Krishna District. Rep. by The ...Respondents _ Petition under Article ^6 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or proceeding more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in investigating into the complaint made by the petitioner dated 28.03.2025 against the Tahsildar of KVB Puram mandal one Mr. Muni Ratnam as the tahsiladar is engaged in corrupt practices by taking bribes and further fabricating revenue records as illegal, unlawful, against the principles of law
and against the fundamental rights of petitioner under Article^14 and 21 the guarantee under Article 300-A of the constitution of India and and thereby to direct the 2nd respondent to investigate into the complaint made by the petitioner dated 28.03.2025 and take necessary action against the Tahsildar Orre Sri Muniratnam in accordance with law expeditiously within a time frame and in addition to the further direction not to interfere with the rights of the petitioner over his property in possession from about 50 years, in any manner whatsoever. lA NO: 1 OF 202*; Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to consider and dispose the complaint dated 28.03.2025 made by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent pending disposal of ' the above writ petition.
^ Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. P SRILATHA REDDY ^ Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ^ The Court made the following order:
I|yj the high court of ANDHRA PRADESH [3331] APHC010265642025 AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT honourable SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI y^T PETITION NO: 13703/2025 THE Between: 1 G sudharshanam pURAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. S/0. PADMANAABAIAH, R/0. 1 MATTAM VILLAGE, ...PETITIONER AND OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT. 1.THE STATE secretary, secretariat BUILDINGS. VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY THE 3RD FLOOR, NTR ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, 2.THE COMMISSIONER, PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or proceeding more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF mandamus declaring the the inaction of the 2nd respondent in the complaint made by the petitioner dated 28.03.2025 of RMB Puram mandal one Mr.
Muni Ratnam as the investigating into against the Tahsildar tahsiladar is engaged m corrupt practices by taking bribes and further fabricating revenue records as illegal, unlawful, against the principles of law and against the fundamental rights of petitioner under Article 14 and 21 and the guarantee under Article 300-A of the constitution of India and thereby to
2 direct the 2nd respondent to investigate into the complaint made by the petitioner dated 28.03.2025 and take necessary action against the Tahsildar One Sri Muniratnam in accordance with law expeditiously within a time frame and in addition to the further direction not to interfere with the rights of the petitioner over his property in possession from about 50 years, in any manner whatsoever and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to consider and dispose the complaint dated 28.03.2025 made by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.P SRILATHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Smt.P.Srilatha Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. The above writ petition has been filed to declare the inaction of the 2^^ respondent in investigating the complaint made by the petitioner dated 28.03.2025 against the Tahsildar of KVB Puram Mandal, since the Tahsildar is engaged in corrupt practices by taking bribes and further fabricating records, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. revenue
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted instructions of the Director General (Vig.&ENFT.) & E.O, Principal Secretary to Government vide Letter No.3471/V&E/Sec.ll/D1/2025, dated
04.07.2025.
Learned counsel further submitted that the representation made by the petitioner was acted upon and the same was communicated to the Regional Vigilance &
3 F Enforcement Officer, Tirupati submit a report to the head office. Thus, as with instructions to conduct an inquiry and
4. seen from the instructions, the grievance of the petitioner regarding inaction on the part of the respondents has Given the facts and circumstances required in this writ petition. been accomplished.
5. of the case, no further orders are Accordingly, the writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions
6. if any, shall stand closed. / Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. One CC fp Sri P $^|tha Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP for General Administration, Pradesh [OUT] High Court of Andhra
3. Two CD Copies TF
HIGH COURT DATED:09/07/2025
ORDER WP NO. 13703 OF 2025 i Id SEP 2125 ^ & . Cun»l>l S«aion ^.•rsPATCV© CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS