VIJENDRA KUMAR OJHA v. RAJYA UTTAR PRADESH DWARA PRAMUKH SACHIV AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/19645/2025 · 2025-10-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191540 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191540 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19645 of 2025 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Learned A.G.A. contends that the petitioner has been identified as the principle offender who molested the victim and thereafter, the victim in her statement has also made a complaint of rape against the petitioner. During the course of investigation allegations of rape against the petitioner have come to light. A prima facie offence is disclosed against the petitioner from the FIR. Faced with this, Shri Dalvir Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the relief for quashment of the F.I.R. in the writ petition. The relief sought in the writ petition is accordingly rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner recasts his relief and submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the competent court for anticipatory bail and other legal remedies available with them. It is always open to the petitioner to avail legal remedies to protect his liberty under the law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Kumar Mishra, Chandrakesh Mishra, Dalvir Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Rudra Kant Mishra Vijendra Kumar Ojha .....Petitioner(s) Rajya Uttar Pradesh Dwara Pramukh Sachiv And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
The writ petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Ashish Tripathi CRLP No. 19645 of 2025 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad