[2025:RJ-JP:23848] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 4th Bail Application No. 6498/2025 Hanif Khan S/o Haji Munir Ahmad, Aged About 35 Years, R/o A- 52, Shiv Nagar, Murlipura Scheme, Police Station Murlipura, District Jaipur. (At Present Petitioner Lodged In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gulam Sabir Pinjara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 30/06/2025 1. This fourth bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.519/2023 registered at Police Station Vishwakarma, District Jaipur (West) for offence under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act. 2. Third bail application of the accused-petitioner bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Third Bail Application No.2904/2025 was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 25.03.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that out of total 16 prosecution witnesses 12 have been examined. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody for last more than one and eight months. He also submits that there are material contradictions in the statements of the prosecution witnesses and there is no independent witness in the matter. He [2025:RJ-JP:23848] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6498/2025] also submits that presence of the Police personnel is also doubtful and he has already moved an application before the learned trial Court for summoning the details of the departure and arrival on the Police Station. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submits that a huge quantity of contraband has been recovered from the possession of the accused-petitioner and his first bail application was dismissed on merits and after dismissal of the third bail application on 25.03.2025 there is no material change circumstances in the matter. 5. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material available on record. 6. Taking into consideration a huge quantity of contraband recovered from the possession of the accused-petitioner and so also the fact that out of total 16 prosecution witnesses 12 have already been examined. The last prosecution witness was examined on 18.06.2025. The Court feels that trial of the case is at fag-end. Hence, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this fourth bail application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /26