HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14392 of 2025 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard Sri Jagdish Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2, 3 and 4, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1 and perused the records. 2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings of S.T. No.2605 of 2024 (State Versus Sazid and others), arising out of Case Crime No.410 of 2016, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 308, 323, 324, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Chhapar, District- Muzaffarnagar, pending before the Additional Session Judge, Court No.1, Muzaffarnagar and also to quash charge-sheet no.267 of 2018 dated 08.12.2018 alongwith summoning order dated 19.01.2019. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants states that an order was passed by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.07.2025 directing the applicants to file the said compromise deed before the court concerned which was to be verified by the court concerned. In pursuance of the said order, the Additional District and Session Judge, Court No.1, Muzaffarnagar vide order dated 19.08.2025 verified the said compromise. Copy of the same is on record. The same is not disputed by learned counsel for the opposite party nos.2 to 4. 4. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jagdish Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, G.A. Sazid And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed. 5. From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising powers by this Court to quash the proceedings, charge sheet as well as cognizance/summoning order as prayed for by the applicants. 6. The present application is allowed. 7. The entire proceeding, charge sheet as well as cognizance/summoning order of the aforesaid case are hereby quashed. October 16, 2025 Radhika NA528 No. 14392 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad