::1:: APHC010266222020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17570/2020 Between: 1. M/S. JRC KCVR PROJECTS, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER B.C. GURU REDDY COLONY,NEAR OLD BUS STAND,BANAGANAPALLY, KURNOOL DISTRICT,REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER B.C MANOHAR REDDY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRINICIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE BANAGANAPALLY GRAM PANCHAYAT, BANAGANAPALLY MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus ::2:: declaring impugned order of the 2nd respondent orders in RC.No.45/2016 dt.04.01.2020 withdrawing the NOC granted to the petitioner for running the Stone crushing unit in survey no 19/1, 29/1, 20 and 20/2 to an extent of about 20 acres in Bhanumukkala village of Banaganapalli Mandal of Kurnool district under the guise that there is no 30 feet road and no permission to use SRBC Canal road even though there is 40 feet road and same was considered at the time of granting permission by the 2nd respondent and all other stone crushing units (mentioned in the writ affidavit) are using SRBC road including petitioner, only by succumbing to political pressures as being as illegal, arbitrary, discriminative and in violation of Article 14, 19 (1) (g), 21 and Article 300 (A) of The Constitution of India and consequently set aside the aforesaid impugned orders of the 2nd respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV ::3:: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17570 of 2020 This Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 23.09.2025 krk ::4:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA 512 WRIT PETITION No.17570 of 2020 krk 23.09.2025