Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19147 (JHR)

SUGAN GIDHI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

C.M.P./583/2025 · 2025-08-22

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:25007 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P No. 583 of 2025 ---- Sugan Gidhi, d/o. Atawa Gidhi, resident of Q. No. E-P/08, Kutku Colony, Abadganj, Sichai Vibhag, P.O. Abadganj, P.S. Medininagar, District Palamau, Jharkhand ..........Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Jharkhand, Nepal House, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Joint Secretary-cum-Director, Department of Water Resources, Jharkhand, Nepal House, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, North Koyal Project (Utari Koyal Pariyojna), Medninagar, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Medininagar, District Palamau, Jharkhand. .........Opp. Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kr. Tiwari, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Divyam, AC to SC-IV ---- 02/22.08.2025 The instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed for correction in the cause-title in view of the fact that petitioner Sugan Gidhi is the daughter of Atewa Gidhi, however, in the cause-title it has been typed as Sugan Gidhi, wife of Atawa Gidhi; due to typographical error in the writ petition also, as such, the same requires correction. Learned counsel also prays for same correction in the cause-title of the writ application as well as the C.M.P. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has no objection to the same. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make suitable corrections in the writ petition as well as in the C.M.P. 4. In view of fair submissions of the parties, order dated 11.06.2025, passed in W.P.(S). No. 2525 of 2025 is modified/corrected to the effect that henceforth, the name of the petitioner be read as ‘Sugan Gidhi, daughter of Atawa Gidhi’ in place of ‘Sugan Gidhi, wife of Atawa Gidhi’. 5. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Kunal