- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22582 WP No. 14263 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 14263 OF 2019 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. APPANNA S/O LATE SIDHANAIKA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS UDDANOOR VILLAGE HANOORU HOBLI KOLLEGALA TALUK - 571 440 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJASHEKER M.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT CHAMARAJANAGAR - 571 313. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22582 WP No. 14263 of 2019 KOLLEGALA SUB-DIVISION KOLLEGALA - 571 440. 4. THE SPECIAL THASILDAR NADA KACHERI, HANOOR KOLLEGALA TALUK - 571 440. 5. 5(a) SMT. SHIVANANJAMMA W/O LATE K.MADHEGOWDA SINCE DIED BY HER LRS PREMA W/O KALESHWAR AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 5(b) RAJU S/O KALESHWAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.41 11TH MAIN ROAD, 'B' BLOCK 1ST STAGE, J.P.NAGAR MYSURU - 570 031. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4; SMT. RAKSHITHA V.N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R5(A & B)) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDERS DATE 01.12.2008 AND 23.11.2015 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER I.E. RESPONDENT NO.3 AND THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER I.E. RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURES-'A' & 'C' RESPECTIVELY. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22582 WP No. 14263 of 2019 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner is assailing the orders dated 01.12.2008 and 23.11.2015 (Annexures-A and C respectively), passed by respondent Nos.3 and 2 respectively. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful examination of the findings recorded by respondent Nos.2 and 3 would makes it clear that khatha has been made in terms of the registered Sale Deed dated 15.04.1976. In that view of the matter, as Khatha has been made pursuant to the execution of the registered sale deed and therefore, if petitioner is having any dispute regarding the same, it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court, if so advised, to adjudicate his right in respect of the subject land. 3. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in the writ petition as there is no perversity in the impugned - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22582 WP No. 14263 of 2019 orders passed by respondent Nos.3 and 2 at Annexures-A and C respectively. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54