PULUVARTHI SRINIVAS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/15513/2025 · 2025-06-26
Nyapathy Vijay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19146 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19146 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010265172025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Puluvarthi Srinivas and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 15513 OF 2025 Puluvarthi Srinivas and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV Court made the following:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 15513 OF 2025 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents in rejecting the application of the Petitioners for assessment of property tax (vacant land) with respect to the subject land to an extent of 167.88 Sq.yds, 166.09 sq.yds and 170.06 sq.yds respectively situated in Sy.No. 263/A of Korretipadu Village, Korretipadu Sub Division, Guntur Municipal Corporation, Guntur District without assigning any reasons as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents would submit that a detailed order passed by the Respondent/ Corporation rejecting the application of the Petitioners for paying property tax, which is unchallenged. In the absence of the same, the present Writ Petition is not maintainable. A copy of the rejection order dated 19.06.2025 passed by the Respondent/ Corporation is placed on record.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to file fresh Writ Petition to challenge the rejection order dated 19.06.2025 passed by the Respondent/ Corporation.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open to the Petitioners to challenge the rejection order dated 19.06.2025 passed by the Respondent/ Corporation in independent Writ Petition. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 27.06.2025 KK