SERVICE NO J3505018 RAM KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/35695/2025 · 2025-10-12
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191450 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191450 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35695 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent No. 2 i.e. Superintendent of Police Fatehpur to issue the Character Certificate of the petitioner on his application dated 05.06.2025 by calling the report from the authorities concerned within time bound frame. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of petitioner dated 31.05.2025 in the light of Civil Misc. Writ (C) No. 718/2025 (Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. thru. Add. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and 3 others) otherwise the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and injury. (iii) Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (iv) Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner."
3. It is stated that the petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Fatehpur to consider his grievances but the respondent No.2 is not paying any heed to it. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jai Prakash Prasad, Pushkar Nath Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Service No J3505018 Ram Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
to the respondent No.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Fatehpur within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same in view of the guidelines laid down by this Court in bunch of writ petitions leading of which is Writ-C No.718 of 2025 (Anil Kumar Vs.
State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. & Others) within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives the representation. October 13, 2025 SS WRIC No. 35695 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad