Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19144 (RAJ)

SMT. DEEPALI SHARMA W/O SHRI GAJENDRA SHARMA v. ADITYA VIHAR VIKAS SAMITI

SAW/775/2022 · 2025-03-25

Inderjeet Singh, Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 775/2022 Smt. Deepali Sharma W/o Shri Gajendra Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o D-12, Patrakar Colony, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus 1. Aditya Vihar Vikas Samiti, Registered Under The Rajasthan Societies Registration Act, 1958, Registered Office At F-2, Diwakar Apartment, Scheme No. 8, Girnar Colony, Queens Road, Jaipur Through Secretary Shri Bhagwat Singh Nathawat S/o Shri K.s. Nathawat. Now Through Present Secretary Shri Sanjay Sharma Son Of Shri A.r. Sharma, Resident Of G-1, Ashirwad Apartment-I, Scheme No. 8, Gandhi Path, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. 2. Jaipur Development Authority, Indira Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur Through Its Secretary. 3. Dy. Commissioner (Zone B-6), Jaipur Development Authority, Indira Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur. 4. Jaipur Development Authority Appellate Tribunal, Through Its Member, J.d.a. Building J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bipin Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kuri with Mr. Harshvardhan Shekhawat Mr. Dharma Ram Ms. Nandini Mirdha Mr. J.K. Singhi, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Tarun Verma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 25/03/2025 This appeal has been filed against the order dated 05.05.2022 whereby the recalling application filed on behalf of respondent No.1 was allowed by the learned single judge. (2 of 2) [SAW-775/2022] We have gone through the order. In our considered view no illegality has been committed by the learned single judge in recalling of its earlier order dated 04.02.2019. It is also informed by the learned counsels that original writ petition Nos.3096/2007 and 3697/2007 are still pending before the learned single judge. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for. The appeal is dismissed. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J ANAND TANWAR /64