HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32082 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Ms. Priyanka Devi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Mohit Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Session Trial No.125 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No.45 of 2024, under Sections 103(1), 352, 3(5) B.N.S., Police Station- Kuthaund, District- Jalaun, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. She has nothing to do with the said offence. It is true that the deceased person had sustained seven injuries, but the lacerated wound sustained by him on his left parietal region of head was found fatal to him. The said injury has been caused by co-accused person Ramji Singh, who was carrying an axe. 5. It is further argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the case of applicant is at different footing to main accused person Ramji. There is no criminal antecedent of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 18.3.2025 and she is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. The well-known principle of "Presumption of Innocence Unless Proven Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dev Prakash Sharma, Priyanka Devi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Neeraj .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Guilty" gives rise to the concept of bail as a rule and imprisonment as an exception. 8. A person's right to life and liberty, guaranteed by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, cannot be taken away simply because the person is accused of committing an offence until the guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution states that no one's life or personal liberty may be taken away unless the procedure established by law is followed, and the procedure must be just and reasonable. The said principle has been reiterated by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 SCC 51. 9. Reiterating the aforesaid view, the Supreme Court in the case of Manish Sisodia Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 INSC 595, has again emphasized that the very well-settled principle of law that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment is not to be forgotten. It is high time that the Courts should recognize the principle that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception". 10. Learned A.G.A. could not bring forth any exceptional circumstances which would warrant denial of bail to the applicant. 11. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that the role of causing fatal injury to the deceased person has been assigned to co-accused person Ramji, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 12. Let the applicant- Smt. Neeraj, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. BAIL No. 32082 of 2025 2 13. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 14. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. October 9, 2025 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 32082 of 2025 3 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad