ANOOP KUMAR AND 3 OTHERS v. RAKESH KUMAR SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
CAPL/3930/2025 · 2025-10-12
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191410 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191410 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3930 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. The sole respondent is present before the Court, who has been identified by the learned Standing Counsel. An application has been filed supported by an affidavit, wherein it is averred that he is not competent authority to decide the case under Section 38 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, in compliance of the order dated 5.11.2024.
2. Learned Standing Counsel has placed before this Court the order dated 8.10.2025 passed by Assistant Collector, Auraiya, whereby O.S. No. 11503 of 2025 has been finally decided in compliance of order dated
5.11.2024. Photostat copy of the order dated 8.10.2025 passed by Assistant Collector, Auraiya is taken on record.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants has admitted the order dated 8.10.2025, but he has tried to challenge the illegality and correctness of the order passed by the opposite party.
4. In my opinion, he has an alternative remedy to challenge the order dated 8.10.2025 passed by the opposite party, in case, he is aggrieved by the said order.
5. In view of the matter, as above, the instant contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
6. The opposite party is exempted from his personal appearance.
October 13, 2025 P.P. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raj Kumar Srivastava, Shiv Poojan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Dinesh Pathak,J.) Anoop Kumar And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) Rakesh Kumar Sub Divisional Magistrate .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad