Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1914 (AP)

Viswa Sai Kuladeep v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/14027/2025 · 2026-05-04

Subhendu Samanta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010278642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 14027/2025 Between: 1. VISWA SAI KULADEEP, S/O LATE VISWA VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY, AGED 24 YEARS,OCC GOVT.EMPLOYEE FLAT NO 501,8 TH LINE, ADITHYA NILAYAM, P N COLONY,GUJARATHIPETA SRIKAKULAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM ,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, WOMEN POLICE STATION,SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 5. GODDU JOSHNA, D/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED 22 YEARS,OCC GOVT. EMPLOYEE R/O PANTHULUPETA VILLAGE /POST, AMADALAVALASA,SRIKAKULAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 3 rd and 4th respondents are not to interfere into the petitioners personal life and liberty and trying to settle the personal issues between the petitioner and 5th respondent and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere into the petitioners personal life as illegal arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.3 and 4 not to interfere into the petitioners personal life and liberty and not to summon the petitioner to the police station pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION No. 14027 of 2025 ORDER: This instant writ petition placed on record is filed by the petitioner, seeking necessary direction upon the authority not to harass the petitioner or to force the petitioner to settle the personal issue between unofficial respondent No.5. 2. The written instructions placed on record by the learned Assistant Government Pleader Home, contains that one complaint was lodged by the respondent No.5 with the concerned Superintendent of Police, which was forwarded to the concerned SHO. After thorough enquiry and preliminary investigation, the police authority is of opinion that the compliant has no merit and accordingly, the said compliant was closed. 3. Taking note of the written instructions of the authority, the instant writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated: 05.05.2026 CVD