Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15862 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Suraj Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents.
2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was appointed as Anganbadi Worker on 05.07.2025 but she has not been appointed joining on the premise that the testimonials and the income certificate is not verified by the respondents and investigation is going on, however, the learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that already the same stands verified.
3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider his claim.
4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that whatever might be, it is for the writ petitioner to take a call and the writ petitioner may approach the fifth respondent, Child Development Project Officer, Prayagraj while filing a comprehensive representation along with the self-attested copy of the writ petition.
5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same.
6. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition before the fifth respondent, who shall on the receipt of the same by 07.11.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suraj Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Adi Shakti Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order.
7. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case.
8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. October 29, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 15862 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad