Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19137 (RAJ)

SHOYAB HUSAIN S/O ANWAR HUSAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6482/2025 · 2025-07-08

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:25118] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6482/2025 Shoyab Husain S/o Anwar Husain, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Near Pani Ki Tanki Anantpura Kota. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 08/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0129/2025 registered at Police Station-Vigyan Nagar, District-Kota City for offences under Sections 109(1), 126(2), 189(2) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. As per FIR, allegation against the petitioner is that he was present with another co- accused at the time of the incident. He further submits that the so called injuries are attributed to Bobby, Luv and Anshul and no specific injury has been attributed to the present petitioner. He further submits that no recovery has been made from the present petitioner, and there are no criminal antecedents against him. He [2025:RJ-JP:25118] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6482/2025] again submits that the petitioner is behind the Bars for last two months The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Shoyab Husain S/o Anwar Husain shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Sunita/90