1 932.Cri.Appln.1822-2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1822 OF 2019 SATISH S/O. SANJAY SURYAWANSHI AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Patil Prakashsing B. APP for Respondent No.1/State : Mr. A.V. Lavte Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mrs. Kazi Sabahat T. … CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND MEHROZ K. PATHAN, JJ. Dated : 30th September 2025 PER COURT : 1. Learned Counsel for the Applicants on instructions, submits that the present application has become infructuous as the Investigating Machinery has filed ‘B’ Summary Report. 2. The learned APP has also added that the concerned Judicial Magistrate First Class has also accepted the said ‘B’ Summary Report. 3. The learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 is also admitted the aforesaid fact. 4 In view of the statement of learned Counsel for the Applicant, the present application stands disposed of being infructuous. MEHROZ K. PATHAN SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE JUDGE JUDGE NAJEEB.. 2025:BHC-AUG:27243-DB