MUKESH VERMA v. STATE OF UP THRU ITS PRINCIPAL SECRATARY HOME
BAIL/26758/2025 · 2025-10-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191362 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191362 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26758 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.147 of 2025, under Sections- 115(2), 352, 351(3), 118(1), 109 B.N.S., Police Station- Sadar Bazar, District- Shahjahanpur, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that though injured has assigned the role of causing two knife injury but the injury report shows that injured has received one knife injury on the elbow which is simple in nature as per report annexed to the supplementary affidavit. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 16.03.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Mukesh Verma, involved in the aforementioned crime Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manish Kumar Kashyap, V.P. Singh Kashyap Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mukesh Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of Up Thru Its Principal Secratary Home .....Opposite Party(s)
be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii.
ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. 9. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. 10. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. October 16, 2025 R.S. Tiwari BAIL No. 26758 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad