SHASHANK ALIAS RINTAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/30270/2025 · 2025-10-13
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191335 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191335 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 30270 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The instant application under section 528 BNSS has been preferred to quash the order dated 17.01.2025 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, First, Court No.12, Jaunpur, whereby charges have been framed against the applicant along with entire proceedings of old Case No.2269 of 2009 and Case No.2064 of 2019 (State vs. Shashank @ Rintal and Others) arising out of Case Crime No.333 of 2009, under sections 332, 353, 506 IPC, P.S. Kerakat, District- Jaunpur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the proceeding initiated against the applicant is illegal and against the material available on record; the material of investigation does not disclose commission of any alleged offences against the applicant and as such the proceedings initiated against the applicant along with impugned order through which charges have been framed against the applicant are liable to be quashed by this Court.
4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer as made in the application and rebutted the stand taken up by learned counsel for applicant by way of submitting that the arguments whatsoever has been raised by learned counsel for applicant is amenable before learned trial court, which is specifically on the basis of statements so recorded by prosecution witnesses and the material evidences, which has been collected during the course of investigation and as such prima-facie offence has been made out against the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shashank Alias Rintal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. After hearing rival submissions extended by learned counsel for the parties and by bare perusal of record, this Court finds no good ground to consider the prayer as sought through the instant application and as such the same lacks merit.
6. The instant application under section 528 BNSS stands dismissed accordingly. October 14, 2025 Saif NA528 No. 30270 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad