[2025:JHHC:19946] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6120 of 2025 ------ Mritunjay Kumar @ Prasen Priya @ Prasan Priya, aged about 36 years, son of Late Satyanarayan Prasad, resident of H. No.1275, NH-33, Kumrum Basti, Behind Hindustan Press, P.O.- Pardih, P.S.- Mango, Town- Jamshedpur, Dist.- East Singhbhum. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-21-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mango P.S. Case No.346 of 2024 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 113 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons committed the murder of Rasik Manjhi. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and admittedly the petitioner only assaulted the victim with slaps, and admittedly the petitioner, after the victim fell down, lifted him from the place of occurrence and made him sleep on a cot; which goes to show that the petitioner had no intention to kill the deceased. It is next submitted that as per the postmortem report, the deceased was heavily drunk, as fluid of 200 CC with smell of alcohol was found in his stomach. It is further submitted that there is no allegation against the petitioner of assaulting the deceased with any weapon. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 23.12.2024 as is evident from para-19 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 24.06.2025 passed in B.A. No.4932 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-III, Jamshedpur in connection with Mango P.S. Case No.346 of 2024 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 113 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/